The high cost associated with constructing and permitting an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) under the existing code severely limits ADU construction and poses a barrier to the City’s affordable housing goals. To remove these financial and regulatory barriers, Evolve Austin proposes following recommendations be included in CodeNEXT >>
CodeNEXT Needs Additional Density on Corridors to Support Transit and Achieve Imagine Austin Mobility Goals
Building a more robust mass transit system is critical to solving Austin’s mobility challenges, but Austin’s sprawling development makes successful mass transit impossible today.
Imagine Austin recognized that land use and mobility are intimately linked, envisioning a more compact and connected city that can only be achieved by changing our Land Development Code.
CodeNEXT remains a work in progress, but a new Evolve Austin Transit Study reveals that there is much work to be done if Austin’s new code is to enable the concentration of residential and commercial development near major corridors that is critical to mass transit success.
Using the respected and oft-cited Puget Sound Regional Council’s literature review of densities required to support Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), the Transit Study examined the relationship between high-capacity transit ridership and the allowable housing/job densities within a 5-10 minute walk of the 35 corridors identified by Imagine Austin as potential high-capacity transit routes.
The study found that the first version of the proposed CodeNEXT would only allow the minimum 17 people and jobs per gross acre required to support BRT in just nine of the 35 corridors, meaning that 75 percent of the transit corridors Imagine Austin established would not effectively support high-capacity transit under the current draft of CodeNEXT.
Anderson Lane, Jollyville Road and Airport Boulevard were identified as the biggest missed opportunities to achieving transit-supportive density based on the concentration of housing and jobs there currently; the minimum additional density required to cross the transit-supportive threshold; and the low impact of the proposed zoning in the first draft of CodeNext.
Braker Lane, Springdale Road and Jollyville Road experienced the lowest impact overall when the proposed zoning was compared to the zoning currently in place.
Successful public transit systems must have a minimum density of people and jobs along the corridors they serve in order to operate efficiently and generate a sustainable amount of ridership. Austin has the population, power and desperate need for transit to succeed. What we’re lacking are the appropriate tools for success to materialize.
This study shows that the proposed CodeNEXT, which is critical to achieving Imagine Austin’s goals, needs to go much further to allow the minimum number of households and jobs required near major corridors to support the robust mass transit system that is vital to get Austin moving again.
As we near the public unveiling of the much-anticipated second draft of CodeNEXT, we strongly urge city leaders to make the changes to CodeNEXT necessary to achieve Imagine Austin’s mobility and sustainability goals before it’s too late.
This week, the AIA local chapter released a preliminary Findings Report based on the organization's May charrette, which brought design and development professionals together to test and "game out" the draft code
Evolve Austin Partners is excited to welcome two new Partner organizations this week, adding to the rapidly-growing coalition of organizations whose work supports the Imagine Austin Plan.
Over the next 25 years, our region is expected to double in population. For those of us who have witnessed Austin’s growth over the previous two decades, that statistic gives us pause. It also raises a fundamental question at the heart of nearly every debate at City Hall: How do we balance the need to expand economic opportunity with our duty to preserve what is unique and wonderful about Austin?
According to a report by Michael Mazerov and Michael Leachman with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, cities should consider investing in local entrepreneurs rather than focus solely on tax breaks and subsidies for large out-of-state corporations. Rather, the report suggests that most jobs are created by in-state businesses, including startups and entrepreneurs. In the end, the authors recommend economic development policies that support these kinds of businesses.
Diverse options for affordable housing are a key tenet of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. As the Texas Observer points out, NIMBYism can show it's face in so many ways, going so far as the desire by some State Legislatures to keep affordable housing options out of the backyards of more affluent neighbors. We've been through this before, and it never was and is not any kind of pathway forward towards the Austin and the Texas we all want to live in.
This Thursday, City Council will consider an amendment to City Code that would curtail the use of Small Lot Amnesty to provide more affordable housing options in the urban core where such options are badly needed.
If we're going to realize on the Imagine Austin vision of a compact and connected city that is accessible and affordable to a broad range of people and income levels we'll need to get more housing on less land. Small Lot Amnesty is an infill tool that can be opted into by neighborhood plans that permit homes to be built on lots smaller than the Austin minimum lot size, if they were originally legal platted lots. For a full description, please see our article here.
In January, we wrote to Council with the letter posted below explaining our reasons for opposing this change.
Ultimately, we'll need to address lot size as part of CodeNEXT. In the meantime, this change strikes us as moving in the wrong direction, away from our comprehensive plan. We encourage Council to send a strong signal to staff that they do not support items that move us away from the goals of Imagine Austin and keep Small Lot Amnesty, as currently drafted, as an option for neighborhood plans.
The Supreme Court has recently affirmed that communities cannot relegate affordable housing into the poorest neighborhoods. Everyone should have access to housing in areas with good schools, transportation, and jobs. Even though the case that lead to the Supreme Court's decision originated in Texas, our State Legislators are able to veto affordable housing projects in their districts. Unfortunately this affected our community just last year with Rep. Tony Dale wielding his veto at the behest of a single Austin Council Member. If we're going to follow through on the Imagine Austin plan, our community can't be in the business of exclusion.
Austin certainly has been shaped by its world famous music festivals - in both good and bad ways. From the public use of parks to the number of people visiting - then moving to Austin - music festivals like Austin City Limits and South by SouthWest are at the hear of change in Austin. CityLab interviews sociologist Jonathan R. Wynn about his new book, Music/City: American Festivals and Placemaking in Austin, Nashville, and Newport to find out how festivals are shaping some of America's most dynamic cities including Austin.
Are more lanes of traffic and wider freeways the answer to our mobility challenges? A Texas Mayor answers "no" and it's not from where you'd expect. Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner took that message to the Transportation Commission in Austin this week calling for a "paradigm shift" away from serving single occupied vehicles that make up 97% of all trips stating that experience shows that "focusing on serving the 97% will exacerbate and prolong the congestion problems that urban areas experience." We hope you will take a few minutes to read and share this remarkable speech from Houston's Mayor and consider whether we might learn something from the experience that they've had with freeway building.
Whether hot markets like Austin effectively combat raising housing prices by adding supply is a contested question in many of the discussions around our land development code. Denver, another market much like Austin in high demand, has seen rents level off and dip in recent months. Analysis shows that added supply increased vacancy rates that lead to the dip in rents. With vacancy rates dropping even further there is possibly even more relief underway.
Following the recent controversy surrounding a Riverside Drive apartment complex demolition permit that displaced around 100 low-income families, City Council has taken a step toward establishing new rules to assist tenants in similar situations in the future. Council approved a resolution Thursday directing city staff to draft an ordinance that would establish “tenant relocation assistance requirements” for developers that intend to demolish multifamily properties that would result in the displacement of current tenants.